Wednesday, April 2, 2008

UK Labor Party Willing to Give-Away Country's Sovereignty to EU; Does the US Democratic Party Wish to Do the Same for America??

President Sarkozy embarrasses Gordon Brown over EU treaty

The Times

March 28, 2008

President Sarkozy of France embarrassed Gordon Brown yesterday, heaping praise on his “courage and loyalty” for ratifying the EU treaty without a referendum.

[SEE Will America Follow the UK Down the 'Slippery Slope' of Unaccountable EU-Driven Global Governance? UK 'I Want a Referendum' Campaign Instructive at: ; 11/6/07 E-mail Correspondences Between Roger Helmer UK Member of European Parliament & Lawrence Kogan, ITSSD CEO, at: ; By Preventing Public Referendum on EU Constitution, Berlin Government Denied German People their Constitutional Right to Public Accountability, at: ; German Parliament Denied Citizens Right to Public Referendum on EU Constitution: Issue Deemed too Important for the People, at: ; UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown Pushes His Pen Through the Heart of Democracy & Economic Freedom, at: ; UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown Fails to Honor Promises Made to British Citizens for Public Referendum on EU Constitutional Treaty, at: ; D'Estaing - French Father of Europe - Admits to Brussels Commission of Constitutional Fraud, at: ].

The president [Sarkozy] said that every other European leader was grateful to Mr Brown for not blocking the replacement to the EU constitution.

In return the Prime Minister signed Britain up to moves to create common EU immigration standards and cooperate on defence and nuclear policy.

At the conclusion of yesterday’s France-UK summit, the French president vowed to continue his charm offensive designed to draw Britain into deeper engagement in the EU.

“It is not simply a matter of a one-night stand. I believe that we can go in to next-day breakfast as well,” Mr Sarkozy said at a joint press conference with Mr Brown.

He said that every EU leader had reason to be grateful for Mr Brown’s “courage and loyalty” in ensuring that the treaty, which replaced the failed EU constitution, would be ratified in the UK. Mr Sarkozy repeated his call for Britain to play a fuller role in the EU rather than “being on the sidelines”. “We need the British to get Europe moving,” he said, hinting that he had rebuked David Cameron for his pledge to put the Lisbon Treaty to a vote during his private meeting with the Opposition leader.

For his part Mr Brown upgraded to formidable the entente that Mr Sarkozy had previously improved from cordiale to amicale. He said: “We believe that, working together, France and Britain can be an even greater force for good so, if you like, this will be the entente formidable.”

A 36-page communiqu� agreed to deepen cooperation on issues including the reform of international financial regulations and institutions, defence and immigration. New arrangements were made to “combat nuclear terrorism” by screening cross-Channel traffic and the creation of a British civilian rapid reaction force to help to stabilise failing states. It was the leaders’ agreement to “take forward a new migration pact under the French presidency of the EU” that is likely to prove the most controversial, however. French ministers have said they want a “common definition of the right of asylum” and have backed European Commission proposals that could see asylum seekers shared between EU states.

Ministers sought to emphasise the measures that Britain and France were taking to deter illegal migrants, saying they had agreed to reinforce fences around the port at Calais, three weeks after a loophole was exposed. Illegal immigrants have been able to sneak aboard lorries in Calais because of inadequate fencing.

The two countries would also carry out a joint security audit and look at creating a fast-track system to introduce lighter controls on some goods vehicles, a statement from the Home Office said.

Ministers also agreed to cooperate to prevent any new Sangatte-type refugee centre developing at Calais or elsewhere on the Channel coast.

As expected Britain and France also agreed to harmonise the regulation of nuclear plants and work together to develop long-term waste facilities. The latter issue became more urgent yesterday with the publication of an official analysis giving warning that waste costs could prove prohibitively expensive for would-be investors.

Mr Brown said they had agreed a common approach to the problems in Afghanistan, Burma and Darfur, as well as the issue of nuclear proliferation. Mr Brown announced a joint British-Franco initiative to bring education to 16 million children in Africa.

Although both leaders called for restraint and dialogue in resolving the crisis in Tibet, Mr Sarkozy repeated his threat to boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Games.

“Depending on how the situation is looking at the time, I reserve the right to say whether I will attend the opening ceremony,” he said.

In contrast, Mr Brown said: “We will not be boycotting the Olympic Games. Britain will be attending the Olympic Games ceremonies. The Dalai Lama has not called for the boycott of the Olympics.”

Mr Sarkozy admitted that there were still tensions over the Common Agricultural Policy but said that for the first time a French president was prepared to debate its future.

Meanwhile Buckingham Palace accepted the blame for what it described as a “minor mix-up” that meant that Mr Brown failed to show up for a photograph before Wednesday’s state banquet. The Queen was heard to ask: “Has the Prime Minister got lost?” after Mr Brown failed to appear alongside the heads of state at the event.

As the monarch and the French President looked around for him, Mr Sarkozy reportedly smiled and remarked to his wife, Carla: “That’s Gordon.” Royal sources confirmed that Palace officials had “misdirected” Mr Brown to sit down.

While the French media broadly hailed the London trip a success, hackles were raised by Mr Sarkozy’s declaration that Britain’s record for the past 30 years was a model that France must follow.


A Le Monde columnist called this “a shameless exercise in toadying intended to win, at whatever cost, the approval of his audience”.

Le Figaro talked of a “Franco- British honeymoon” but said that it was up to Gordon Brown now to accept France’s hand.

France was also bemused by the collective swoon of the British media at the arrival of the President’s new supermodel wife. “The English conquered by Carla,” said a headline in le Parisien, under its story on “L’op�ration s�duction du couple Sarkozy à Londres”.

When diplomacy can be a touchy subject

— Paul Keating, the former Australian Prime Minister, put his arm around the Queen during her 1992 tour to the country, earning himself the nickname “Lizard of Oz”

— Geri Halliwell, a member of the Spice Girls, was scolded for turning up 40 minutes late to meet the Queen at a Buckingham Palace reception in 2005. She also pinched the Prince of Wales’s bottom

— In 2004, when Jacques Chirac, was French President, he was admonished by Britain’s tabloids for almost touching the Queen. One headline read “Hands off!” and the accompanying story described how Mr Chirac “came within a whisker of manhandling The Queen”

— Last year President Bush mistakenly said that the Queen had helped to celebrate the US bicentennial in 1776, rather than 1976. He didn’t help the situation by winking at the monarch, earning him a disapproving look described by the President as one “only a mother could give a child”


No EU referendum

Financial Times

March 7 2008

Parliamentary rejection of a referendum on the Lisbon treaty will be a great relief to Gordon Brown. The UK prime minister need fear no longer this vexatious but, to him, second order question. Europe’s capacity to convulse British politics has been neutralised. But not for ever.

True, the chances of a plebiscite on Lisbon are now close to nil. The issue could be reopened if Ireland – the only one of the European Union’s 27 member states that will put the treaty to a referendum – votes it down. Even then, while that would give the EU a bad headache, Britain’s Conservative opposition will still probably not be able to muster enough votes in parliament to force a referendum.

Mr Brown and Labour may pay some price for ostensibly welching on a manifesto pledge to hold a popular vote on the defunct constitutional treaty. But even before they were repackaged into Lisbon, these reforms always amounted more to an amending treaty than a constitution. They are less far-reaching than the Maastricht treaty and – especially – the Single European Act signed by Margaret Thatcher, which produced literally thousands of laws on Britain’s statute book.

It is also manifestly in Britain’s as well as Europe’s interest to have a more coherent international voice, greater national scrutiny of EU law, and a fairer distribution of votes. You would not guess this from the way both Labour and the Tories so easily capitulate to tabloid jingoism.

In that comic-book narrative, the whole enterprise is about protecting the national veto, the Excalibur whose magic potency can scythe down the heathens of qualified majority voters. Whatever Europe proposes, Britain must oppose.

Mr Brown’s apparent pluck in resisting a referendum should not be mistaken for courage or principle; all the bluster about red lines and opt-outs could not conceal fear of defeat. At best, he took the right decision for the wrong reasons.

As for the Liberal Democrats, the UK’s most enthusiastic Europeans, their posture – abstention in order to highlight their demand for a plebiscite on Britain’s EU membership – left them looking foolish. Unless it was a ploy to exemplify the problem with referendums: that they tend to elicit answers to questions that are not being asked.

Europe remains a “wedge” issue between the parties and within all of them. Until that changes, Europe will always haunt British politics.

Tony Blair, the most pro-European leader for a generation, spurned the opportunity to enhance Britain’s influence in and through Europe. Mr Brown will be no different. Yet what better means is there for milking prosperity from globalisation while alleviating some of its side-effects? For effective multilateralism and multiplying power in facing challenges from climate change to terrorism? But Britain can only be a shaping force in Europe if it begins to see it as an opportunity.

No comments: